1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (144 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 5 weights approximately 796 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Ami | 5 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 601 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1416 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 60 L |