1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 5,461 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 358 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Citroen | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Ami | ML |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 5461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 382 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 95 L |