1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2009 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2009 Nissan GT-R is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 3,799 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan GT-R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan GT-R (480 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 454 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan GT-R weights approximately 822 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Nissan GT-R is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan GT-R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 2009 Nissan GT-R | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | Ami | GT-R |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 601 cc | 3799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 480 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 74 L |