1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2010 Ford Galaxy
To start off, 2010 Ford Galaxy is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Galaxy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Galaxy (201 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Galaxy should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Galaxy weights approximately 1159 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 2010 Ford Galaxy | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Ami | Galaxy |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 601 cc | 2791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1779 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 70 L |