1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Clio (81 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Renault Clio weights approximately 551 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 2011 Renault Clio | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | Ami | Clio |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.7:1 | 17.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 624 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 4.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 55 L |