1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | Ami | Matrix |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 601 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 50 L |