1966 Citroen DS vs. 2000 Ford e-Ka
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,175 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Citroen DS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Citroen DS (108 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Citroen DS should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Citroen DS weights approximately 242 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Citroen DS. (177 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Citroen DS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen DS | 2000 Ford e-Ka | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | DS | e-Ka |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2175 cc | 1758 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2730 mm |
