1966 Citroen DS vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen DS would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1966 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen DS.
Because 2009 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen DS | 2009 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | DS | Challenger |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 3518 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 70 L |