1966 Citroen DS vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,175 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Citroen DS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1966 Citroen DS. (125 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen DS.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda 3 has automatic transmission and 1966 Citroen DS has manual transmission. 1966 Citroen DS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen DS | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | DS | 3 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2175 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 55 L |