1966 Citroen DS vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen DS would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1966 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 23 kg more than 1966 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen DS | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | DS | 3 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1303 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4595 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 55 L |