1966 Citroen DS vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1966 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 200 kg more than 1966 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen DS | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | DS | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 50 L |
