1966 DAF 44 vs. 1963 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1966 DAF 44 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Zastava 1300 (53 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1966 DAF 44. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Zastava 1300 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1966 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Zastava 1300 (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DAF 44. (71 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1963 Zastava 1300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF 44 | 1963 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | DAF | Zastava |
| Model | 44 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 844 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2430 mm |
