1966 DAF 44 vs. 1979 Seat Ritmo

To start off, 1979 Seat Ritmo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF 44 would be higher. At 1,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Seat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Seat Ritmo (63 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1966 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Seat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Seat Ritmo weights approximately 140 kg more than 1966 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 DAF 44 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF 44. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Seat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Seat Ritmo (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DAF 44. (71 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1979 Seat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DAF 44.

Compare all specifications: