1966 DAF 44 vs. 1999 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF 44 would be higher. At 1,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 468 kg more than 1966 DAF 44.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DAF 44. (71 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF 44 | 1999 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | DAF | Ford |
| Model | 44 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 844 cc | 1753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Top Speed | 114 km/hour | 321 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1208 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2540 mm |
