1966 DAF 44 vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF 44 would be higher. At 3,248 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (240 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1966 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 970 kg more than 1966 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (316 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DAF 44. (71 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DAF 44.

Compare all specifications:

1966 DAF 44 2002 Jaguar XJ
Make DAF Jaguar
Model 44 XJ
Year Released 1966 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 844 cc 3248 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type boxer in-line
Horse Power 34 HP 240 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6350 RPM
Torque 71 Nm 316 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4350 RPM
Engine Bore Size 85.5 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 73.5 mm 70 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 740 kg 1710 kg
Vehicle Length 3890 mm 5160 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1310 mm
Wheelbase Size 2260 mm 2880 mm