1966 DAF 44 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF 44 would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1966 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 615 kg more than 1966 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF 44 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF 44. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Matrix (165 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DAF 44. (71 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF 44 | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | DAF | Toyota |
Model | 44 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 844 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2610 mm |