1966 DAF 44 vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF 44 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1966 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF 44.
Because 1966 DAF 44 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF 44. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (177 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DAF 44. (71 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF 44 | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 44 | 6 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 844 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 177 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.5 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.6:1 | 10.8:1 |
Top Speed | 114 km/hour | 208 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2680 mm |