1966 DAF 44 vs. 2009 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF 44 would be higher. At 2,354 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda CR-V (164 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1966 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF 44.
Because 1966 DAF 44 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF 44. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Honda CR-V (161 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DAF 44. (71 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF 44 | 2009 Honda CR-V | |
Make | DAF | Honda |
Model | 44 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 844 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 161 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.6:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2630 mm |