1966 DAF 44 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF 44 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1966 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF 44.
Because 1966 DAF 44 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF 44. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu (217 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DAF 44. (71 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF 44 | 2011 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | DAF | Chevrolet |
| Model | 44 | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 844 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4872 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2852 mm |
