1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1966 DAF Daffodil is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Jeep CJ3A (59 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 444 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 1951 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | DAF | Jeep |
Model | Daffodil | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1966 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2040 mm |