1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1954 Saab 92B
To start off, 1966 DAF Daffodil is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Saab 92B would be higher. At 764 cc (2 cylinders), 1954 Saab 92B is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Saab 92B weights approximately 119 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Saab 92B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 1954 Saab 92B | |
Make | DAF | Saab |
Model | Daffodil | 92B |
Year Released | 1966 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2480 mm |