1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1963 Ford Anglia
To start off, 1966 DAF Daffodil is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Ford Anglia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ford Anglia (47 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ford Anglia should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ford Anglia weights approximately 112 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 1963 Ford Anglia | |
| Make | DAF | Ford |
| Model | Daffodil | Anglia |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 47 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 778 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 40 L |
