1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1964 Reliant Rebel
To start off, 1966 DAF Daffodil is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Rebel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Rebel would be higher. At 746 cc (2 cylinders), 1966 DAF Daffodil is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Reliant Rebel (27 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Reliant Rebel should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DAF Daffodil weights approximately 145 kg more than 1964 Reliant Rebel.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 1964 Reliant Rebel | |
| Make | DAF | Reliant |
| Model | Daffodil | Rebel |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 521 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2270 mm |
