1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1965 Peugeot 204
To start off, 1966 DAF Daffodil is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Peugeot 204. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Peugeot 204 would be higher. At 1,130 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Peugeot 204 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Peugeot 204 (54 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Peugeot 204 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Peugeot 204 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Peugeot 204, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 1965 Peugeot 204 | |
| Make | DAF | Peugeot |
| Model | Daffodil | 204 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1130 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 54 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 936 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 50 L |
