1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1965 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1966 DAF Daffodil is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Zastava 1500 (53 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Zastava 1500 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 314 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 1965 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | DAF | Zastava |
Model | Daffodil | 1500 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2430 mm |