1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, both 1966 DAF Daffodil and 1966 Suzuki Fronte were released in the same year (1966). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 785 cc, 1966 Suzuki Fronte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Suzuki Fronte (35 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Suzuki Fronte should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Suzuki Fronte weights approximately 94 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | DAF | Suzuki |
| Model | Daffodil | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2250 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 66 L |
