1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1968 Ford Mustang is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 309 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | Daffodil | Mustang |
Year Released | 1966 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 335 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2750 mm |