1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1973 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 1973 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 1973 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | DAF | Mitsubishi |
Model | Daffodil | Lancer |
Year Released | 1966 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |