1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1974 Triumph 2000 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Triumph 2000 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 579 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | DAF | Triumph |
| Model | Daffodil | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2700 mm |
