1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1977 Ford 2000
To start off, 1977 Ford 2000 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Ford 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Ford 2000 (100 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Ford 2000 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Ford 2000 weights approximately 666 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 1977 Ford 2000 | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | Daffodil | 2000 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1332 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 61 L |