1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1977 Triumph Dolomite
To start off, 1977 Triumph Dolomite is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Triumph Dolomite is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Triumph Dolomite (57 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Triumph Dolomite should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Triumph Dolomite weights approximately 274 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 1977 Triumph Dolomite | |
| Make | DAF | Triumph |
| Model | Daffodil | Dolomite |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 56 L |
