1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,410 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste (74 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste weights approximately 244 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | DAF | Mitsubishi |
Model | Daffodil | Celeste |
Year Released | 1966 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1410 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2350 mm |