1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1980 TVR 3000
To start off, 1980 TVR 3000 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 TVR 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 TVR 3000 weights approximately 354 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 1980 TVR 3000 | |
| Make | DAF | TVR |
| Model | Daffodil | 3000 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 2994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 58 L |
