1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1982 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1982 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,275 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Thunderbird (87 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 770 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 1982 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | DAF | Ford |
| Model | Daffodil | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 3275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 87 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1436 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 80 L |
