1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1983 Dodge Daytona
To start off, 1983 Dodge Daytona is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Dodge Daytona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Dodge Daytona (146 HP) has 120 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Dodge Daytona should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Dodge Daytona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 1983 Dodge Daytona | |
| Make | DAF | Dodge |
| Model | Daffodil | Daytona |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 146 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2470 mm |
