1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1983 Pontiac 1000
To start off, 1983 Pontiac 1000 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Pontiac 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Pontiac 1000 (64 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Pontiac 1000 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Pontiac 1000 weights approximately 294 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 1983 Pontiac 1000 | |
Make | DAF | Pontiac |
Model | Daffodil | 1000 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2400 mm |