1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1986 Audi 4000
To start off, 1986 Audi 4000 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 4000 (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 4000 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1986 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 1986 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | DAF | Audi |
| Model | Daffodil | 4000 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2550 mm |
