1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1986 Mini MK V
To start off, 1986 Mini MK V is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 998 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mini MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mini MK V (41 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mini MK V should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DAF Daffodil weights approximately 41 kg more than 1986 Mini MK V.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Mini MK V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 1986 Mini MK V | |
| Make | DAF | Mini |
| Model | Daffodil | MK V |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 41 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2040 mm |
