1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1988 Volkswagen Passat
To start off, 1988 Volkswagen Passat is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Volkswagen Passat is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Volkswagen Passat, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 1988 Volkswagen Passat | |
| Make | DAF | Volkswagen |
| Model | Daffodil | Passat |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1620 mm |
