1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1988 Zastava 750
To start off, 1988 Zastava 750 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 848 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Zastava 750 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Zastava 750 (33 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Zastava 750 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DAF Daffodil weights approximately 26 kg more than 1988 Zastava 750.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 1988 Zastava 750 | |
| Make | DAF | Zastava |
| Model | Daffodil | 750 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1988 |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2010 mm |
