1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1991 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1991 Lotus Elan is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 134 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Lotus Elan weights approximately 331 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 1991 Lotus Elan | |
Make | DAF | Lotus |
Model | Daffodil | Elan |
Year Released | 1966 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 160 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 997 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2260 mm |