1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1992 Jaguar XJR-15
To start off, 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,993 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 (450 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 424 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 weights approximately 384 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 | |
Make | DAF | Jaguar |
Model | Daffodil | XJR-15 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 5993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 450 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 90 L |