1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1996 Rover 220
To start off, 1996 Rover 220 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 220 (103 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 220 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 220 weights approximately 548 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 220, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 1996 Rover 220 | |
Make | DAF | Rover |
Model | Daffodil | 220 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1214 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 50 L |