1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star

To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star weights approximately 649 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1966 DAF Daffodil 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star
Make DAF Mitsubishi
Model Daffodil Space Star
Year Released 1966 1998
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 746 cc 1834 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 26 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 666 kg 1315 kg
Vehicle Length 3620 mm 4040 mm
Vehicle Width 1450 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase Size 2060 mm 2510 mm