1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 1999 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 746 cc (2 cylinders), 1966 DAF Daffodil is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 184 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 1999 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | DAF | Mitsubishi |
Model | Daffodil | Pajero |
Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |