1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2000 Renault Laguna
To start off, 2000 Renault Laguna is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,782 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Renault Laguna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Renault Laguna (116 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault Laguna weights approximately 719 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Laguna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2000 Renault Laguna | |
Make | DAF | Renault |
Model | Daffodil | Laguna |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1782 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 70 L |