1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2001 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2001 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar X-Type (194 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 894 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Jaguar X-Type is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar X-Type will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2001 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | DAF | Jaguar |
Model | Daffodil | X-Type |
Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 61 L |