1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2001 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2001 Toyota Condor is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,992 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Condor (86 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Condor should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Condor weights approximately 1011 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2001 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | DAF | Toyota |
| Model | Daffodil | Condor |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 2992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1677 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 70 L |
