1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2002 MCC Smart
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 746 cc (2 cylinders), 1966 DAF Daffodil is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Smart (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MCC Smart weights approximately 124 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2002 MCC Smart | |
Make | DAF | MCC |
Model | Daffodil | Smart |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 80 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 35 L |