1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2002 Suzuki Samurai
To start off, 2002 Suzuki Samurai is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Suzuki Samurai is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Suzuki Samurai (62 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Samurai should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki Samurai weights approximately 514 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Suzuki Samurai is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Samurai will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2002 Suzuki Samurai | |
Make | DAF | Suzuki |
Model | Daffodil | Samurai |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1700 mm |